Earlier this week I found myself bummed out by the perception that many American’s didn’t recognize the clear choice of visions for our country that are laid before us in this presidential election. I began writing a post that sought to lay out these visions on either side in hopes that it might help some make this important decision based on the vision that they want for America rather than the narrative that Mitt Romney is a bigot who “wants your father to take away your free birth control then impregnate you and force you to carry the child to term even if it kills you”[i]or that he is a sleazy rich guy who wants to make sure that the “47%” can never get an education and will all die of cancer while he and his rich friends roll around in pits of money and eat the souls of children. However, in light of last night’s debate, I think that the Governor made a clearer and more persuasive statement for his vision than I could have. It doesn’t mean that I will never publish that post, but it just means that it has become less urgent. In the meantime, there are some misconceptions that have been bothering me and I want to set the record straight.
Note: I started writing these and the first one was long enough to be its own post. Accordingly, I have made them each a unique post, with the link below. I won’t finish them all tonight, so make sure you check back for the others as I finish them. You could even subscribe to my blog, then you will be notified as I post the others.
[i] I stole this from the vodkapundit at pjmedia.com (http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2012/10/01/the-libertarian-case-for-mitt-romney/?singlepage=true)